Tuesday, November 01, 2005

The Objective and Practical Need Not Apply

The Powerline guys covered John Tierney's ruminating on why university faculties are overwhelmingly liberal. Tierney simply puts forth the arguments presented to him by various, presumably liberal, academians and allows them to fall flat of their own accord.

Well, as someone who has one foot in academia and one foot out (mostly out, thankfully), I feel there is a better, expository argument. To wit, conservatives are not attracted to environments that are not governed by principles of accountability, objective standards and the discipline of the marketplace – i.e. the university, where faulty scholarship can thrive and demonstrably failed theories can still retain enormous respect. Further, conservatives are generally not attracted to forums that address meaningless issues. The world does not need a new feminist interpretation of Beowulf, or a GLBT view of impressionist painting or some other such typical pursuit of the modern University, and a conservative would chafe at the thought of resources being spent on something of such negligible value.

1 Comments:

Blogger Donny Baseball said...

Of course it is a generalization, but I think a fair one. It is well-documented the liberal bias in terms of just numbers, but to me the real effect is in the degree. Where faculty are liberal, they are disproportionately extremely liberal. Where faculty are conservative, they are overwhelmingly mildly conservative, as in the conservo-libertarian bent that you mention. Where I work, the numbers aren't as bad as at, say, the Ivy League, but the liberals are totally deranged liberals and the concervatives are conservo-libertarian. There are zero extreme conservatives and close to zero, moderate liberals, what I call Moynihan liberals.

12:31 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home